In it’s article “The Web Trail“, the Guardian announces today “From tomorrow, the Guardian will publish stories first to the web”. This is, they say “ending the primacy of the printed newspaper”. Lofty words.
The Guardian is not, of course, the only paper to be putting a lot of focus into its online offer. And this seems much more like the normal development of news transmission. And it will be interesting to see how the medium changes how news is accessed. On the one level, how news publishers decide to make a profit.
It could go the way of Salon.com which shows non-members a few seconds of advertising. Or a “premium” membership with three different plans: one year premium ($35.00), one year premium with ads ($22.50), monthly premium ($6.00).
Or the way of The New York Times, which has free registration which gives basic access to news and archives, and paid subscriptions ($49.95/year) for “exclusive access to Op-Ed and news columnists on NYTimes.com, easy and in-depth access to The Times’s online archives, early access to select articles on the site, as well as other exciting features such as News Tracker and Times File.”
And despite the dire concern that online newspaper versions have cannibalised sales, this fear just ignores that going online gives newspapers the chance to have fast, trackable revenue options. Relevant online marketing can increase a newspaper’s value to readers (do you mind links to where you can buy the book after a book review?). And unlike offline advertising (which newspapers haven’t opposed) it’s easy to tell which advertising is valuable and effective.
The other level of course is technology. Like the NYT’s offer, it will be interesting to see what services (specialised news, exclusive access, etc.) news services create. And the tools they will add. Already, blogs are integrated to news websites. The Washington Post (which has required, but free, registration), for example, uses technorati to link all blogs that site articles (with the blog-integration company BlogBurst). And offers del.icio.us tagging as well.
The Guardian’s call that it will break news first online seems like an inevitable. But the claim that “we will take the internet seriously, but we must not let it get in the way of our primary business which is publishing a paper each night seems unnecessarily fearful (not to mention their revolutionary claim). I don’t think it’s reckless to say that catching up with the way readers consume media (and pay for media) is the only way to remain journalistically and financially viable.
As Ten Red Roses writes:
Thinking about it, I used to buy newspapers regularly, definitely every week, and I went through phases of buying a daily paper. Now I tend to buy a daily paper only if I am going on a train journey, or if there is something I am particularly interested in; I rarely buy a Sunday paper. I get all the news and comment I can handle through [the] internet these days.
There are elephants in (chat)rooms. These are exciting times.













Recent Comments